THE MALAYSIAN BUSINESS TRIBUNE

Friday, November 27, 2009

najibnoecomnomics or jinxed ghost ALTANTUYA C4 MURDER Dubai's debt default fears shake investor confidence, rattle stock markets


This is Najibrosspussynomics.


Despite the soft economy, the government is mulling the use of imported luxury cars for judges to replace its leased fleet of ageing Proton Perdana V6 Executive vehicles which are no longer in production.

The cars — Mercedes Benz S class, BMW 5 series, Toyota Camry and Honda Accord — are likely to be leased for four years from Spanco Sdn Bhd, which has a 25-year concession with the government ending 2018 that is now worth RM80 million a year.

The Mercedes Benz S class.

The Malaysian Insider has learnt that the judiciary has decided on using the Mercedes Benz.

Is this the cronyism ? Remember what are the service, repair & maintenance costs incurred in those BN ruling counties ?
Is this conducted in the transparent Open Tender way ? Another "Revolving Door " Business ?
Remember what was MB of the Court of Perak has said on the use of TOYOTA Camry as official cars ?

Where is the Performances of our National Car, Proton ? Aren't they have KPI

The new cars could raise heckles as Barisan Nasional (BN) lawmakers had objected to Pakatan Rakyat (PR) administrations in both Perak and Selangor for opting to use Toyota Camrys over the Perdanas, accusing them of being unpatriotic and disloyal to the national carmaker.

The BN government that ousted PR in Perak later put the Camrys on the auction block early this year.

The BN government in Terengganu also raised eyebrows last year when it ordered 14 Mercedes Benz E200 Kompressors for RM3.43 million to replace the Perdanas, citing costly maintenance for the national car.

The BMW 5 series.

Proton is already looking at a new model next year to replace the flagship Perdana, which was launched in 1995 as the badge-engineered version of the seventh-generation Mitsubishi Eterna. The current Proton Perdana V6 Executive used by the government is 10 inches longer than the standard model.

Another government source said the new cars had competitive lease rates, reducing initial costs but he reckoned Spanco can turn in a tidy profit from maintenance charges.

"The lease for each car is four years and maintenance charges are a bit high but they do everything from A to Z. So on paper, it's worth it for the government," he told The Malaysian Insider.

The government stopped buying cars for the administration and senior government officers since January 1994 by agreeing to lease from Spanco which initially provided Mercedes Benz and Volvo models.

But the Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad administration stopped that in 1997 under its austerity drive during the height of the Asian financial crisis.

Deputy Finance Minister Datuk Kong Cho Ha told Parliament last year that apart from cars for official government use, Spanco also leased saloon cars for the various ministries and federal departments.

"Under the agreement, Spanco is responsible for supply, maintaining and repairing all cars leased by the government.

"In return, the government pays for the cost of rental, maintenance and repairs to Spanco on a monthly basis based on the number and type of cars leased," he said in reply to Lim Kit Siang (DAP-Ipoh Timur) who wanted to know the cost and benefits of leasing Proton Perdana V6 as official cars of the government.

He said until July 2008, a total of 8,341 cars were leased of which 105 were for use by members of the government administration.

The Proton Perdana V6.

"The average yearly maintenance cost (not including repairs) for the Perdana V6 cars was RM2,373, which was 55 per cent less than RM3,693 for the standard yearly maintenance cost of a Mercedes," he said, adding that the government found using the Perdana V6 to be very practical as it seldom had serious technical problems.

Apart from the Perdana as a standard car for government servants, Spanco also provides the Proton Waja.

Spanco was given the contract to lease and maintain vehicles for the government for 25 years as part of the government’s privatisation exercise. It was seen a good deal as many government departments, such as the police force, had thousands of cars, and leasing and maintenance was not Spanco’s core business.

In 2004, the Finance Ministry asked Coopers & Lybrand to review the Spanco deal in the belief that the government had paid too much. The contract sum was then reduced by 20 per cent from RM100 million a year to RM80 million a year.

The decision to renegotiate the Spanco contract came after the then Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said that the government would look into lopsided concessions.

Najib, who succeeded Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi as prime minister last April, had added the government would learn from its mistakes to ensure that it did not get the short end of the stick when negotiating deals with the private sector.


Investors recoiled from risky assets today and dumped shares in Asian banks and builders, fearing a Dubai debt default could reignite the financial turmoil of the credit crisis.

Stocks from Tokyo to Mumbai were haunted by suspicion of lenders’ exposure to Dubai firms that built islands in the Gulf, planned cities from Pakistan to Africa and fashioned the financial hub of the world’s biggest oil exporting region.

“This an important reminder that the credit crisis is forgotten but not gone,” Robert Rennie, strategist at Westpac Global Markets Group, said in a note.

Asian banks, like their European peers, scrambled to distance themselves from Dubai, a desert emirate that emerged from dusty obscurity to invest in global lenders such as Standard Chartered and lure fund managers with the promise of a tax-free lifestyle. Dubai, part of the oil-exporting United Arab Emirates, said on Wednesday it would ask creditors of state-owned Dubai World and Nakheel to agree to a standstill on billions of dollars of debt as a first step towards restructuring.

Dubai World, the conglomerate that led the emirate’s expansion, had US$59 billion (RM200.13 billion) of liabilities as of August, most of Dubai’s total debt of US$80 billion. Nakheel was the builder of three palm-shaped islands off Dubai.

The news shook markets recovering from the collapse of the US housing bubble and contagion that threatened to rupture the global financial system last year.

“The panic button’s been hit again,” said Francis Lun, general manager of Fulbright Securities in Hong Kong.

Analysts expect financial support from Abu Dhabi, the UAE’s largest emirates and producer of most of its oil. But Dubai may have to abandon an economic model that focused on developing swathes of desert with foreign money and labour.

The prospect of a bailout did little to allay concerns among investors, already worried the global economy may not be recovering quickly enough to justify a near doubling of prices for emerging market stocks and many commodities since March.

“The biggest worry I have is whether this will trigger a repricing in the overall emerging market,” said Arthur Lau, a fund manager in Hong Kong with JF Asset Management.

The nerves showed in credit markets, at the centre of the financial storm triggered by the Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy last year.

Asian credit default swaps, used to insure against default, were at their widest in a month, with the Asia ex-Japan iTraxx investment-grade index touching 124/129 basis points.

Dubai’s credit default swaps were being quoted as high as 500-550 basis points, some traders said on Thursday.

BANKS

Dubai’s debt problems are a hangover from a property bubble that imploded after the financial crisis derailed its plans to become a magnet for tourists and a regional hub for everything from shipping to entertainment.

Banks’ exposure to a Dubai default pales in comparison to the US$2.8 trillion in writedowns the International Monetary Fund estimates US and European lenders will have to make between 2007 and 2010 as a result of the credit crisis.

International banks’ exposure to Dubai World could be as high as US$12 billion, banking sources told Thomson Reuters LPC..

It was the fear of the unknown that was driving trade.

“Similar stories to the one in Dubai are likely to come out, leading risk money to pull out from assets such as commodities and stocks,” said Takahiko Murai, general manager of equities at Nozomi Securities in Japan.

Japan’s biggest bank Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group fell as Japan’s Nikkei average struck a four-month closing low. It also came under pressure from weak exporters after the dollar hit a fresh 14-year low against the yen. The Australian and New Zealand dollars retreated.

Oil extended yesterday’s decline to tumble below US$75 a barrel. Shanghai copper and Chicago grains each dropped around 2 per cent.

Shares in HSBC Holdings, one of the bookrunners on an outstanding US$5.5 billion Dubai World loan, dropped more than 7 per cent and Standard Chartered losses topped 6 per cent. The London listed shares of the two lenders led the biggest tumble in European bank stocks in six months on Thursday.

The Dubai crisis could have a “meaningful impact” on banks across Asia, said Daniel Tabbush, Asia banks analyst at CLSA in Bangkok, listing Standard Chartered, HSBC and Singapore’s DBS Group as the most exposed in the region.

DBS shares were not traded due to a market holiday in Singapore.

China State Construction International and ICICI Bank were among Asian firms that said they had no exposure to Dubai after their shares fell.

Builders, such as Australian construction firm Leighton Holdings, took a beating on concern that money due from Dubai’s grandiose construction projects, including the world’s tallest building, would not be paid. — Reuters





Indian stocks and the rupee skidded on Friday as Dubai's debt woes sparked fears over corporate exposure to a key trading partner and

that foreign funds will lose their appetite for risk.

Banking, property and construction-related shares were among those hardest hit, after Dubai said two of its flagship firms planned to delay repayment on billions of dollar of debt. Foreign investors have poured roughly $15 billion into Indian stocks this year, helping drive a 75 percent rally through Thursday, and were among the sellers on Friday.

Dubai said on Wednesday it wanted creditors of Dubai World and property group Nakheel to agree to a debt standstill as it restructures Dubai World, the conglomerate that spearheaded the emirate's breakneck growth. Dubai World had $59 billion in liabilities as of August.

"Whenever this sort of situation arises you will see a flight to safety, but I think within the emerging markets space India and China clearly are the favourites, so to that extent they will be protected on the downside," said Manish Sonthalia, portfolio manager at Motilal Oswal.

The benchmark Sensex pared losses to 2.2 percent on buying at lower levels in mid-afternoon trade after falling as much as 3.8 percent, outperforming the 4 percent drop in the MSCI Index of non-Japan Asia.

India and the United Arab Emirates, of which Dubai is a member, are separated by the Arabian Sea and closely linked by the millions of Indians who work in the region. Indians make up about 40 percent of the UAE's population, accounting for 10 to 12 percent of India's inward remittances, CLSA said in a report.

The UAE was the second-biggest export destination for India during the nine months through December 2008, accounting for $14.6 billion, or 11.15 percent of India's total -- a share that has been rising and closing in on the United States.

"This event would be a trigger for investor risk aversion and that could slow down the flow of capital into emerging markets, and Indian stocks would be affected by that," said Gaurav Kapur, senior economist at ABN Amro Bank in Mumbai.

Minister for trade Anand Sharma said India's economy was unlikely to be hard-hit by the situation in Dubai. "India is a very large economy. I don't think some development in the real estate in Dubai is going to impact the Indian economy," he told reporters.

While Indian banks are heavily focused on the domestic market, they are active in handling remittances from overseas workers and India's banking index was down 3 percent.

Bank of Baroda, which had a total exposure in the UAE of around 100 billion rupees ($2.1 billion) according to its chairman, saw its shares fall about 7 percent. The mid-sized lender has 10 branches in the Gulf, more than any other Indian bank, according to CLSA, but the exposure is mostly related to remittances, the brokerage said.

SENTIMENT HIT
Several market players said the biggest impact of Dubai's difficulties would be on sentiment. "The market was expensive, and it was looking for a reason to correct, and Dubai happened to be one," said Anand Shah, head of equities at Canara Robecco Mutual Fund. "Fundamentally, we are not impacted. But, if the risk appetite comes off, the liquidity flow could reduce," he said.

Many Indian companies were quick to play down their exposure to Dubai. Engineering conglomerate Larsen & Toubro said it had exposure to Dubai of $20 million to $25 million. India's largest listed realty firm, DLF, and second ranked Unitech said they had no exposure to Dubai, and leading private bank ICICI Bank said it had no material exposure.

Real estate shares were down 3.83 percent. Nagarjuna Construction said it was slowing down its real estate operations in Dubai. "We have only one real estate project in Dubai, to develop 1.45 million sq feet ... and right now in the Dubai real estate market we are going slow on this project," Y D Murthy, executive vice-president, finance, said.

Emaar MGF, a joint venture between Indian financier MGF and the UAE's Emaar Properties, is one of several Indian property firms planning a listing. It has filed papers with the market regulator to raise about $830 million, about half the amount it had planned to raise in 2008.

Emaar MGF declined comment, saying it was in a silent period after having filed the prospectus for its share offering.

"For real estate per se, the pressure would be due to lack of investor appetite at a time when a slew of IPOs are lined by local real estate companies," ABN Amro's Kapur said.


NEW YORK: It's one Forbes list where none would want to figure, but Ramalinga Raju, the founder-chairman Satyam Computers (now Mahindra Satyam),
has managed the feat of being among the world's 10 most outrageous CEOs.

Raju has been ranked as the world's fourth most outrageous CEO in 2009 on the list compiled by the Forbes, known for its rankings of the richest and the most powerful the world over.

Giving Raju company are Sri Lankan-origin American hedge fund manager Raj Rajarathnam (third), former Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain (2nd) and Goldman Sachs' Lloyd Blankfein (1st).

Raju, the only Indian on the list dominated by Americans, owes his place on the list to his disclosure in January about committing the country's biggest ever corporate fraud.

In January, B Ramalinga Raju, the founder of Satyam Computer Services, confessed to overstating its profits over several years and creating a fictitious cash balance of more than $1 billion.

He confessed to inventing more than 10,000 fictional employees to help him steal money from the company, and using his mother's name to buy land with the proceeds. The police arrested Raju, his co-founder and brother, B Rama Raju, and former CFO Srinivas Vadlamani on charges of cheating, forgery and breach of trust.

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Italian prosecutors asked a judge to issue prison sentences for three Google executives

Italian prosecutors on Wednesday asked a judge to issue prison sentences for three Google executives and one former executive accused of defamation and failure to comply with privacy laws in a case that could alter the way Google operates in Italy and the rest of Europe.

The prosecutors contend that Google was negligent because it allowed a video of high school kids bullying a disabled classmate to stay on its Italian-language video service for two months in 2006. The company, based in California, says it removed the video several hours after being alerted of its existence.

The prosecutors submitted a 119-page document with evidence they say shows Google must have known about the video long before it was taken down.

The prosecutors rested their case after asking for a one-year sentence for three executives — David Drummond, senior vice president and chief legal officer; Peter Fleischer, global privacy counsel; and George Reyes, a former chief financial officer. They are seeking a six-month sentence for Arvind Desikan, who is now head of consumer marketing in Britain.

If found guilty, the four defendants, none of whom were present in court, would not serve jail time because sentences of less than three years are commuted in Italy for those who do not have a criminal record.

If prosecutors can persuade the judge the company knew the video was online and chose to do nothing, Google might be forced to change its operating practices in Italy and the rest of Europe by creating filters to flag offensive videos.

Google and the prosecutors agree the video was uploaded Sept. 8 and removed Nov. 7, 2006. The prosecutors presented evidence showing that in early October, a month before the video’s removal, there were comments posted saying that it should be taken down. One of those messages read, “This is shameful! This should be taken down immediately.”

“It is reasonable to imagine that comments like this were followed by requests by these same people that the video be removed,” the
Prosecutors Press Case Against Google in Italy


prosecutors wrote in the document they presented to the judge.

Prosecutors say the video was removed only after Vivi Down, an Italian association that defends the rights of people with Down Syndrome mentioned in the video, contacted authorities who then contacted Google.

Google, which will present its defense next month, said in a statement Wednesday that it “did exactly what is required under European and Italian law.”

“We took the video down when notified by the authorities and, thanks to our cooperation, the bullies who recorded and uploaded it have been identified and punished,” the statement said.

Google is apologizing for a racially offensive image of Michelle Obama that appeared near or at the top of the list when users searched for pictures of her on its site, The Associated Press reported from San Francisco.

Google placed a text ad above the image titled “Offensive Search Results” that states: “Sometimes our search results can be offensive. We agree.”

Users who clicked on the ad were directed to a letter from Google that explained that its results “can include disturbing content,” but noted that Google did not endorse content on those Web sites. “We apologize if you’ve had an upsetting experience using Google,” the company wrote.

The White House declined to comment.

Sign in to RecommendNext Article in Technology (9 of 19) »A version of this article appeared in print on November 26, 2009, in The Interna

Wall Street’s Spin Game








Lloyd C. Blankfein, chief executive of Goldman Sachs, the bank to bash on a resurgent Wall Street, is receiving a lot of advice lately, and it’s not just about money
FACE IN THE CROWD A mock wanted poster of Lloyd Blankfein, chief executive of Goldman Sachs, sits during a union rally outside the firm's offices in Washington.
Related

$500 Million and Apology From Goldman (November 18, 2009)
Is Goldman’s Charitable Gesture Enough?


Does the firm have an obligation to make philanthropic efforts?
Post a Comment »
Enlarge This Image




Sitting before an audience of 300 at the Metropolitan Club of New York on Tuesday, he spoke with barely disguised disdain in his voice about the work of the image consultants, reputation experts and public relations advisors who are beating a path to his door, and to the doors of other Wall Street banks vilified for their profits and million-dollar bonuses at a time of continuing economic pain.

“Some people come in and say, ‘You are doing too much. Don’t say another word.’ Other people say we should get on the talk shows,” said Mr. Blankfein (as he was awarded the distinction of C.E.O. of the Year by a magazine for corporate directors.)

A few years ago, Wall Street would have cared less for such artifice — it was enough that the Masters of the Universe were wildly successful; their success spoke for itself. But politics and the bottom line have energized the relationship between these New York institutions of money and spin, as banks see the need to calm the rage directed toward them and confront a public relations problem that has seemed in recent weeks to be spiraling out of control.

Just last week, Goldman announced that it would spend $500 million to help thousands of small businesses recover from the recession. At the same time, Mr. Blankfein acknowledged that Goldman had made mistakes. “We participated in things that were clearly wrong and we have reasons to regret and apologize for,” he said.

But is that enough? And, if it isn’t, what will be? Examples of the public’s anger at Wall Street are legion. Last month, a couple of thousand protesters marched on the American Bankers Association’s annual conference in Chicago brandishing cut-outs of bank C.E.O.s.

As the Chicago demonstration made clear, the image problems aren’t confined to Goldman and could have a cost. Wall Street banks are under regulatory pressure, and come election time, if unemployment is still above 10 percent and Wall Street is still paying itself big bonuses, lawmakers’ wrath might force broader pay curbs, tougher restrictions on what banks can do, or even a break up of the biggest banks.

They are already losing business because of their toxic reputations. One recent Goldman deal, for instance, to buy cheap assets from Fannie Mae, the hobbled mortgage lender, was blocked by the Treasury because it couldn’t be seen to be helping Wall Street benefit once again from the crisis. Critics say the negative media chatter is dragging on their share price.

Now, the main securities industry trade organization has hired Brunswick, a powerhouse public relations firm, to burnish the banks’ image, and banks are urging their staffs to cut down on conspicuous consumption and are canceling Christmas parties in an attempt to turn the reputational tide.

It is a tough brief, even for Manhattan’s skilled public relations industry. Last week, New York State’s comptroller reported that Wall Street profits this year are on track to exceed the record set at the height of the credit bubble. So what to do? Here are some suggestions about making the unloved Masters of the Universe loveable again.

Be humble: Apologize and say thank you.

The quickest way for the banks to redeem themselves could be to admit they played a role in the crisis and that their survival depended on taxpayer money.

Several public relations executives pointed to John J. Mack, Morgan Stanley’s chief executive, as an example of a banker wisely getting in front of the problem early. It was Mr. Mack who offered a full-throated mea culpa at a Congressional hearing last February for his bank’s role in fueling the crisis. “We are sorry for it,” he told lawmakers.

One public relations executive, who does not work for Mr. Mack and who asked not to be identified for fear it could hurt his relationships with other bankers, said: “They have done the best job of anybody of navigating the crisis.” Not every bank has been willing to apologize even though “maintaining otherwise manifestly contradicts the reality that most people see,” according to Stephen Davis, executive director at the Millstein Center for Corporate Governance and Performance at Yale University.

Goldman’s apology, for instance, was a grudging start but it may not be enough. “They should be taking advertisements, they should hold seminars, news conferences,” said Howard J. Rubenstein, president of Rubenstein Associates, who argues for a more effusive mea culpa. “This is a time for gratitude and attitude. One letter to the editor, one news conference, one speech does not make an image.”

Give Back Some Money.

Donating money to a worthwhile cause is another way of soothing public outrage.

1 2 NEXT PAGE »
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: November 26, 2009


An article on Nov. 18 about Goldman Sachs’s response to criticism of its high pay and its role in the financial crisis, using information from a Bloomberg News article, quoted imprecisely from remarks by its chief executive, Lloyd C. Blankfein, at a conference in New York. Mr. Blankfein said, “We participated in things that were clearly wrong and we have reasons to regret and apologize for.” He did not say: “We participated in things that were clearly wrong and have reason to regret. We apologize.” The imprecise quotation was repeated in an article in Week in Review on Sunday. (The quotation appeared correctly in an editorial on Sunday.)

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Extra-judicial kilings DELIBERATE MUSAN HASSAN ATTEMPT TO SMEAR THE GOOD NAME OF THE MALAYSIAN POLICE


The police have not been able to trace Raja Petra. — Reuters pic


The Sessions Court was today told that a warrant of arrest issued against blogger Raja Petra Raja Kamaruddin could not be served as he still could not be traced despite various efforts by the police.

Deputy public prosecutor Mohd Hafiz Mohd Yusoff said the show cause notice to Raja Petra’s bailor, Mable@Marina Lee, also could not be served.

He said this at the trial of Raja Petra, who is charged with defaming the prime minister’s wife, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor and two others.

Today is the second time the case was called up for mention. The first was on May 26 when the arrest warrant was issued. Raja Petra, 59, is charged with defaming Rosmah, Lt Col Abdul Aziz Buyong and his wife Lt Col Norhayati Hassan, in a statutory declaration made at the Jalan Duta Court complex here at 10.25am on June 18 last year.

Investigating officer ACP Aziz Zakaria, who was testifying under oath, said police had taken various steps to locate Raja Petra, including placing an officer to monitor his house in Sungai Buloh.

“We do receive information on Raja Petra’s movement and have tried to locate him at several locations where he would normally be, but until now we don’t know where he is,” he added.

He said efforts to track down Raja Petra would continue as he also had a case at the Petaling Jaya Sessions Court, which had also issued an arrest warrant against him.

Aziz also said he could not ascertain if Raja Petra was still in the country.

Judge Mohamad Sakeri Mamat set Nov 13 for final mention of the case. – Bernama



U can deny as much as you like but there must be thousands of Malaysians who had experienced under the hands of your dogs..

I personally have seen your personnels giving flying kick to the head especially detainees who are already handcuffed or arrested or surrendered themselves especially lowly paid foreign workers.

Maybe the Police Inspector-General ought to read over and over again what RPK wrote: “This is how the Malaysian police gets you to confess to crimes…..”.
I did, and I could not find anything in the comment by RPK which claimed that the men featured in the video were uniformed personnel from PRDM. If RPK had posted a video of a couple having sex and added the comment that that was how Cyfool was conceived, it is utterly wrong for anyone to conclude that the couple featured in the porn movie are Cyfool’s parents. The video merely suggested HOW Cyfool was conceived and not WHO conceived the disasterous idea of bringing Cyfool into this planet.
The country’s top cop yesterday rubbished a video posted on the website, Malaysia Today, allegedly showing police brutality during an interrogation.
Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan denied that the men featured in the five-minute grainy video, believed to be shot using a mobile phone camera, were policemen.
It showed a group of men, in white shirts and black pants, “interrogating” a suspect who was accused of raping a man’s wife. They are seen punching and stomping on the man, who does not appear to fight back.
Website editor Raja Petra Kamaruddin posted a link to the YouTube video under the heading “Modern interrogation methods of the Malaysian police”.
In a comment that accompanied the video Raja Petra wrote: “This is how the Malaysian police gets you to confess to crimes, even if you never committed them. But even after you do confess the ‘interrogation’ does not stop.”
Enraged by the posting and the video, Musa called it “too much”.
“He (Raja Petra) should be more responsible in his postings next time. He should take a good look at himself before accusing us.
“He’s not the right person to denigrate us when he is on the run from the police.”"He’s not the right person to denigrate us when he is on the run from the police.”
He is the perfect person to denigrate you…..
“We will also seek Interpol’s help to locate him.”
How can you seek Interpol’s help… I saw him eating mee goreng at Brickfields at 9:00pm last night.
Musa said the police were working with their counterparts in Australia to find Raja Petra who is said to be in Brisbane.
“We will also seek Interpol’s help to locate him.”
On April 23, a warrant of arrest was issued for 59-year-old Raja Petra after he had failed to turn up in court for his sedition trial.
He had claimed trial on May 6 last year to publishing a seditious article on April 25 on his web portal.

Maybe the Police Inspector-General ought to read over and over again what RPK wrote: “This is how the Malaysian police gets you to confess to crimes…..”.

related article
it take a real dirtcop to rubbished a video posted on the website, Malaysia Today, allegedly showing police brutality during an interrogation.

related article

the IGP real dirtcop have links with the Chinese drugs, prostitution, illegal gambling and loan-shark syndicate based in Johor and which was expanding its operation throughout Malaysia HIS CONTRACT MUST BE RENEWED AT ANY COS? najib with that much baggage dont have a choseT

related article


related article

IGP TO RAJA PETRA YOUR DAYS NUMBERED,I HAVE DOSSIER FOR ALL,I CAN GO ON FUCKING YOU MALAYSIANS FOR EVER NO ONE CAN DO ANYTHING PERIOD!



Raja Petra Kamarudin to IGP MUSA HASSAN,HEAR WHAT UMNO Member of Parliament Nur Jazlan HAS TO SAY YOUR DAYS ARE FINISH CLOCK IS TICKING THE COURT IS WAITING


PETALING JAYA, Nov 11 — Blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin was given a discharge not amounting to acquittal on a sedition charge by the Sessions Court today because the police cannot trace him.

Judge Rozina Ayub, in making the order, said it was most embarrassing for all the parties concerned that the prosecution had failed to serve the warrant of arrest on Raja Petra, as a result of which a discharge had to be given and the case was left hanging and without an ending.

"This case cannot proceed. It's a pity because the prosecution had called seven witnesses," she said.

Rozana also ordered that a notice be served on Raja Petra's wife Marina to show cause why she should not forfeit the RM5,000 bail that she had posted.

"The bailor in this case, namely his wife, has to come to court to explain his absence, or forfeit the bail," she said.

Earlier, deputy public prosecutor Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar told the court that the police had failed to trace Raja Petra till today.

The court had expected the case to be disposed of by the end of next month and the prosecution had lined up at least eight witnesses. However, Raja Petra went missing after seven witnesses were called.

The court subsequently gave three postponements — on May 22, July 17 and a final one on Oct 12 — to enable the prosecution and police to trace him.

On May 6 last year, Raja Petra, 60, pleaded not guilty to posting seditious words relating to an article in his website www.malaysia-today.net on April 25 last year.


In confronting a crisis of epic proportions, one can do the heavy work of crafting a well conceived, comprehensive strategy. But why bother, when short-term gimmicks are politically more feasible. Thus we have this absurd counter-cyclical gimmick, the so-called “cash for POLICE” boondoggle, being offered by the NAJIB establishment as their “answer” to the massive problems

Politicians indicates that corruption has seeped into administrative machinery, politics, judiciary and police. God forbid if a citizen of Malaysia has to stand up for himself against these forces, he is a worthless street-dog unless he has power, money or influence. The police is the only face which millions of MALAYSIANS see daily, even when they don’t have to deal with corrupt government or judiciary. Are your streets safe from the licensed goons ? Are your women safe from them ? Are you stressed out because they have certain rights to stop you at every traffic signal and ask for identity, license, papers, multiple times a day ? God forbid, if you are a street vendor, and you are anyway giving away 60% of your day’s profit to them but yet always at the mercy of not being beaten up by them at their whim, say, when they consume alcohol or when their seniors surprise them with a visit. What to say a simple road block restriction is imposed, don’t we dream of when the restrictions will go away and we don’t have to see their ugly leering faces again ? Do we like to welcome with open hands the above-the-law big brother, no, we are scared they might arrest us with false reports, they might misbehave with our women, they might beat us up for no reason and then will create a mock-up situation with cooked-up stories for the media/seniors. Haven’t you heard of stories where innocent citizens has been killed in encounters ? talking about states where things are peaceful except for communal riots and well, bravo, how well they have done their jobs. Innocent victims who register A POLICE has to recall them after their pockets are full, no matter how serious the crime is. For most of us, he is not just a neighboorhood big brother, he is the face of the government. If he is bad, the government is bad. Now, you see WHY PAKATAN wins hands downall the by election. or systems ineffectiveness is no justification for Police brutality. From my personal experience, I remember when as TAXIDRIVER FOR 25 years was beaten by a police like a criminal, who supposedly caught me without MYCARD (although i had one-its another story that the ……
That impression is buried in my mind for malaysian Police (& again its not a single person im pointing to – its in collective sense ) that, they are inhuman, dishonest, without any moral character lot, bunch of cheapster who will sell their anything for a bunch of ringgit. On top of it- these IGP AGS lot – it hurts to see they after all the education – end up misusing power & further detoriating this corrupt system.
you are right in blaming politicians and beurocrates for what ever mess the police or MCC forces are in.in case of ANWAR it is the special powers ISA that are have been given to the ex IGP forces are playing havoc on people.and these draconian laws are passed by these politicians.you seem to be well aware of situation, is bleeding it is bleeding MALAYSIA also and god knows when this will end.,
The main stream mediaTHE UTUSANDOGS the author seems to push the belief that end always justifies the means. The author should go and contact the poor and downtrodden people who live in rumah panjang and PPRUNITS,and ask them if they enjoyed the brutality the cops showed. People like you and me were lucky enough to have the resources to run away from problem areas. Guess what happened to those that couldn’t?? Thats right…..they suffered. In my book they are the real heroes, not the cops. Yet even today, those same heroes are treated with malice, contempt and general disrespect by the men and women in uniform. To a cop, a non-wealthy MALAYSIAN citizen is a nuisance. Before they donned a uniform, these cops took an oath, one that required them to sacrifice their conveniences for the greater good of society. At times those sacrifices may also include their lives. Yet nearly 95% of these “protectors” fail in their most basic functions. In reality, they are merely vassals of the political groups in power. As far as I am concerned, I will continue to question the actions of cops, cuz whether they like it or not, they will be always held accountable on a higher level. If they don’t like what they are getting into………..leave, there are a lot of able men and women out there that can do better.In confronting a crisis of epic proportions, one can do the heavy work of crafting a well conceived, comprehensive strategy. But why bother, when short-term gimmicks are politically more feasible. Thus we have this absurd counter-cyclical gimmick, the so-called “cash for POLICE” boondoggle, being offered by the NAJIB establishment as their “answer” to the massive problems
Politicians indicates that corruption has seeped into administrative machinery, politics, judiciary and police. God forbid if a citizen of Malaysia has to stand up for himself against these forces, he is a worthless street-dog unless he has power, money or influence. The police is the only face which millions of MALAYSIANS see daily, even when they don’t have to deal with corrupt government or judiciary. Are your streets safe from the licensed goons ? Are your women safe from them ? Are you stressed out because they have certain rights to stop you at every traffic signal and ask for identity, license, papers, multiple times a day ? God forbid, if you are a street vendor, and you are anyway giving away 60% of your day’s profit to them but yet always at the mercy of not being beaten up by them at their whim, say, when they consume alcohol or when their seniors surprise them with a visit. What to say a simple road block restriction is imposed, don’t we dream of when the restrictions will go away and we don’t have to see their ugly leering faces again ? Do we like to welcome with open hands the above-the-law big brother, no, we are scared they might arrest us with false reports, they might misbehave with our women, they might beat us up for no reason and then will create a mock-up situation with cooked-up stories for the media/seniors. Haven’t you heard of stories where innocent citizens has been killed in encounters ? talking about states where things are peaceful except for communal riots and well, bravo, how well they have done their jobs. Innocent victims who register A POLICE has to recall them after their pockets are full, no matter how serious the crime is. For most of us, he is not just a neighboorhood big brother, he is the face of the government. If he is bad, the government is bad. Now, you see WHY PAKATAN wins hands downall the by election. or systems ineffectiveness is no justification for Police brutality. From my personal experience, I remember when as TAXIDRIVER FOR 25 years was beaten by a police like a criminal, who supposedly caught me without MYCARD (although i had one-its another story that the ……
That impression is buried in my mind for malaysian Police (& again its not a single person im pointing to – its in collective sense ) that, they are inhuman, dishonest, without any moral character lot, bunch of cheapster who will sell their anything for a bunch of ringgit. On top of it- these IGP AGS lot – it hurts to see they after all the education – end up misusing power & further detoriating this corrupt system.
you are right in blaming politicians and beurocrates for what ever mess the police or MCC forces are in.in case of ANWAR it is the special powers ISA that are have been given to the ex IGP forces are playing havoc on people.and these draconian laws are passed by these politicians.you seem to be well aware of situation, is bleeding it is bleeding MALAYSIA also and god knows when this will end.,
The main stream mediaTHE UTUSANDOGS the author seems to push the belief that end always justifies the means. The author should go and contact the poor and downtrodden people who live in rumah panjang and PPRUNITS,and ask them if they enjoyed the brutality the cops showed. People like you and me were lucky enough to have the resources to run away from problem areas. Guess what happened to those that couldn’t?? Thats right…..they suffered. In my book they are the real heroes, not the cops. Yet even today, those same heroes are treated with malice, contempt and general disrespect by the men and women in uniform. To a cop, a non-wealthy MALAYSIAN citizen is a nuisance. Before they donned a uniform, these cops took an oath, one that required them to sacrifice their conveniences for the greater good of society. At times those sacrifices may also include their lives. Yet nearly 95% of these “protectors” fail in their most basic functions. In reality, they are merely vassals of the political groups in power. As far as I am concerned, I will continue to question the actions of cops, cuz whether they like it or not, they will be always held accountable on a higher level. If they don’t like what they are getting into………..leave, there are a lot of able men and women out there that can do better.
In confronting a crisis of epic proportions, one can do the heavy work of crafting a well conceived, comprehensive strategy. But why bother, when short-term gimmicks are politically more feasible. Thus we have this absurd counter-cyclical gimmick, the so-called “cash for POLICE” boondoggle, being offered by the NAJIB establishment as their “answer” to the massive problems Raja Petra Kamarudin

Some of you may think that theSEE VIDEO ON YOUTUBE HERE video is in bad taste. I mean, how can we make fun of Teoh Beng Hock’s death when we should instead be mourning him? Yes, it was a hard decision to make as to whether to publish that video or not. But we decided to do it anyway not with intent to make fun of Teoh’s death but to reveal the real circumstances behind his death. And the video best describes the events behind what really happened

7097440108_protester_isa_slideshow_7

No to ISAISA2


The police askes why we are only looking at the police? Linggam asks why we are only looking at the judiciary. The parliament ask why are we only looking at the executives. The rulers ask why are only looking at the monarchy. In the end nothing gets looked at. We’re back to square one. No actions on complains. People who complain gets thrown into ISA for their safety. The corrupt in power gets bolder and increasingly obnoxious.
Great argument there, Hisham. You are another example why I have zero respect for my leaders. They are not smart. And they can’t sound smart even if their life depended on it. In fact, they dont even make sense half the times. Can somebody tell me the last time anybody in BN said something intellegent that is not already a well known fact?
You missed the point, Sham. This is not selective persecution. Pushing for the IPCMC is simply saying that crime is out of control as you Sham pourself has admitted and to check police abuse of power. Why are you and the PDRM so defensive? If they have nothing wrong, there is nothing to be afraid of. In fact, if the PDRM is innocent as alleged, they should welcome the IPCMC to clear their names independently. It is only those that has shit between their backsides that are afraid to be scrutinised. Plain and simple.
Why?
Because:
- Kugan was killed by the police
- The police personnel who are responsible for Kugan’s death is still walking free, still having a job at a police desk
- Because many others have lost their lives in police custody
- Because police are gangsters who arrest without valid reasons, like how they arrested the 5 lawyers who only wanted to represent their clients
- Because police are corrupt.
- Because mat rempits and snatch thieves roam free.
- Because police are pussies who are afraid of having a beat base in Jln Haji Taib
- Because police are not impartial, always obviously acting on umno orders.
- Because police do not respect the law, illegally removing a speaker from the dewan where it has no jurisdiction
- Because police are rude as hell (Mr headhunter the classic example)
- Because police has lost the faith of the rakyat
- Because the rakyat demands the police to be cleaned up.
Way to go Ragu, I will wallk with you to PM office at Putrajaya and I am sure at least 3,000LAWYERS more of us from the bar will too. Just say when.MALAYSIA MUST avoid yet another crisis. Although oscillating between corrupt civilian governments and POLICE dictatorships, crises have been a way of life for MUSA HASSAN But this crisis IS different. It was not particularly for or against a leader. It was the third act of a grass-roots movement, led by the lawyers, in favor of the rule of law under a constitutional framework.
MALAYSIA appears to be on the verge of emerging as a functioning Constitutional Democracy, witH primacy of laws and constitution that has eluded MALAYSIA for 51 years of its checkered history.
THIS times in the lawyers, men and women in their somber black coats MUST defied the illegal edicts of the case of judicial sodomy. and succeed in forcing the government to back down.
Ragunath said”I will tell him that these are the areas that need to be looked into so that there won’t be a recurrence,” he said.
Is Nazri admitting that the Home Minister screwed up? That’s the first! I just hope he won’t backpaddle. the council had also lodged a complaint with the Malaysian Human Rights (Suhakam) Commission as it was a matter concerning a breach of human rights.”For those matters that are linked to the police, I will hand the memorandum over to Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein.
As the minister in charge of judiciary affairs, Nazri said he wanted to ensure that the rule of law was upheld
“The court action is still ongoing and we will definitely file it on behalf of the five lawyers,” he told reporters after handing over a memorandum to Minister in Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Abd Aziz at the Parliament lobby here Tuesday.
bar council got some teeth ? way to go.
Show them that nobody is beyond the law.
Najib at Odds with Tun Dr. Mahathir
“If they are not united, how are we going to realise the 1 Malaysia concept? This will not only be detrimental to the Malays but also to other races…When we talk about Malay unity, we are not talking from the racism point of view. We have accepted the fact that there cannot be a government which is led 100 per cent by Malay leaders … we have been practising power sharing for so long”
In a speech that he was supposed to have delivered at the Harvard Club of Malaysia on 29th July 2002, this is what Mahathir is reported to have said :
“When I wrote The Malay Dilemma in the late 60s, I had assumed that all the Malays lacked the opportunities to develop and become successful. They lacked opportunities for educating themselves, opportunities to earn enough to go into business, opportunities to train in the required vocation, opportunities to obtain the necessary funding, licences and premises. If these opportunities could be made available to them, then they would succeed. …… So what is the new Malay dilemma? Their old dilemma was whether they should distort the picture a little in order to help themselves. The new dilemma is whether they should or should not do away with the crutches that they have got used to, which in fact they have become proud of. There is a minority of Malays who are confident enough to think of doing away with the crutches, albeit gradually. But they are a very small minority. Their numbers are not going to increase any time soon. They are generally regarded as traitors to the Malay race. ….
Distort the picture in order to help themselves!
That the truth then was that every marginalised Malaysian, regardless of race, “lacked opportunities for educating themselves, opportunities to earn enough to go into business, opportunities to train in the required vocation, opportunities to obtain the necessary funding, licences and premises”, was buried in the distorted picture that was presented, so that certain quarters could help themselves.
11 years before that reported speech to the Havard Club, in 1991, Mahathir launched his Vision 2020 where he also spoke of establishing a united Malaysian nation; a Bangsa Malaysia, as he put it. I have alluded to this in a previous post last year. This is what Mahathir had said in 1991 of that Bangsa Malaysia :
“By the year 2020, Malaysia can be a united nation, with a confident Malaysian society, infused by strong moral and ethical values, living in a society that is democratic, liberal and tolerant, caring, economically just and equitable, progressive and prosperous, and in full possession of an economy that is competitive, dynamic, robust and resilient. There can be no fully developed Malaysia until we have finally overcome the nine central strategic challenges that have confronted us from the moment of our birth as an independent nation…The first of these is the challenges of establishing a united Malaysian nation with a sense of common and shared destiny. This must be a nation at peace with itself, territorially and ethnically integrated, living in harmony and full and fair partnership, made up of one ‘Bangsa Malaysia’ with political loyalty and dedication to the nation…The eighth is the challenge of ensuring an economically just society. This is a society in which there is a fair and equitable distribution of the wealth of the nation, in which there is full partnership in economic progress. Such a society cannot be in place so long as there is the identification of race with economic function, and the identification of economic backwardness with race.”
18 years on from that inspirational speech of his, why is it that we do not appear to be anywhere near establishing that one ‘Bangsa Malaysia’ with political loyalty and dedication to the nation ?
Was Mahathir’s Vision 2020 no different from his ‘Look East’ policy that he innovated soon after taking office, in that both were made up of inspiring rhetoric with little political will to carry through and which got us all sufficiently distracted so that the privileged hands that were raiding the national coffers could work at will and unnoticed?
What is the difference between Mahathir’s Vision 2020 and Najib’s 1Malaysia?
Is there such a difference between Mahathir and Najib that we should be encouraged to believe that, whilst Mahathiir had little impact in taking us anywhere near the Bangsa Malaysia he spoke of, with Najib, it will be otherwise ?
by Haris Ibrahim
Almost everyone knows, because they have read the above article which informed them of the relevant law applicable, which is that it is the Assembly who decides the question of the disqualification of a member of the Assembly and not the Election Commission. It is only when a member has been disqualified would there be a vacancy in the Assembly.
Now that we, the ordinary people, know the law we could very easily judge the competence of these judges of the Federal Court.
Recently, they have handed down a written judgment dated June 8, 2009 which was delivered by Nik Hashim bin Nik Abd Rahman FCJ as the judgment of the court.
The judgment appears to be oblivious of the fact that the general public is now aware of the law applicable. Since the people has been apprised of the law it would be foolish for any judge to ……..
POSTED BY TAXID786DRIVER AT 7:00 AM




Kulim MP Zulkifli Noordin, you are disgrace, into oral sex dont open your asshole mouth Muslims need equal opportunities not quotas or handouts

controversial Kulim MP Zulkifli Noordin, is TRING TO BE a good ANAK HARAM TO UMNO won his seaton a PKR PLAMIN BUT NOW TRING TO SLEEP WITH UMNO SLEEPING WITH UMNO “My challenge to YB Siva, I dare you to step down within 24 hours as Vice President and we contest one to one. Let the PKR members decide whether defending and upholding Islam and the Muslim rights is or is not the party policy.

“If I lost then I am more than willing to leave PKR, for a party that do not defend and uphold Islam and the Muslim rights is not the party that I should be associated with,” he said in a statement today.While Zulkifli Noordin itches for a fight with fellow PKR MP Sivarasa Rasiah, their colleagues are defending the controversial Kulim MP against talk that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has targeted him as an errant member.

“Anwar was talking in general and was not targeting anyone,” said Teluk Kemang MP Kamarul Baharin Abbas.

Both Bayan Baru MP Datuk Zahrain Mohamed Hashim and Balik Pulau MP Yusmadi Yusoff also denied that Anwar had targeted Zulkifli.

Two days ago, Anwar at the opening of the PKR Penang state convention warned errant PKR leaders and members to stay loyal or quit the party, saying he could accept criticisms against the party but would not compromise with leaders and members who could not follow the stipulated party policies.

It was reported that PKR vice-president Sivarasa Rasiah had said that Anwar’s warning was for people like Zulkifli, who then challenged the Subang MP to quit his party post for a popularity contest.

However the MPs denied today that Sivarasa attacked Zulkifly but his words were taken out of context.

“We will defend his right to speak,” Wangsa Maju MP Wee Choo Keong added.

controversial Kulim MP Zulkifli Noordin, a man known for his hardline Islamic views, challenged party vice president Sivarasa Rasiah to quit and face off with him in a contest over party policy.

His remarks come a day after Sivarasa reportedly said that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s recent warning to party members to leave and join Umno if they did not agree with PKR policies was directed at the Kulim MP.

“My challenge to YB Siva, I dare you to step down within 24 hours as Vice President and we contest one to one. Let the PKR members decide whether defending and upholding Islam and the Muslim rights is or is not the party policy.

“If I lost then I am more than willing to leave PKR, for a party that do not defend and uphold Islam and the Muslim rights is not the party that I should be associated with,” he said in a statement today.

controversial Kulim MP Zulkifli Noordin, is TRING TO BE a good ANAK HARAM TO UMNO won his seaton a PKR PLAMIN BUT NOW TRING TO SLEEP WITH UMNO SLEEPING WITH UMNO “

aksikurangajar



CAN Vande Mataram bridge the differences
Muslims need equal opportunities not quotas or handouts. Last Tuesday, home minister P Chidambaram drew flak for attending a convention of maulvis in Deoband where, among other things, it was decreed that Muslims should shun Vande Mataram, India’s national song. The attack was both misdirected and misplaced. If anything, the minister deserved admiration for his sermon on democratic niceties to a gathering of theologians professing a wide range of certitudes. ‘‘The golden rule in a democracy,’’ he told the convention hosted by Darul Uloom, arguably the most influential Sunni Muslim seminary in the subcontinent, ‘‘is that it is the duty of the majority to protect the minority, be it religious, racial or linguistic. It is a self-evident rule... firmly rooted in the universality of human rights.’’


What seemed self-evident to Chidambaram, has been self-evident to most Indians for long. Stemming from Hindu sanatan dharma, diversity and negotiations have been at the heart of the Indian experience. From overcrowded railway compartments to modes of worship and even politics, ‘adjustment’ has been the euphemism for a nebulous humaneness that is at odds with intolerance, regimentation and the quest for super-efficiency. ‘‘We are like this only’’ may be a caricature of India’s blundering and chaotic ways but it is also a profound encapsulation of a civilizational resilience that has astounded outsiders. ‘‘The secret of (India’s) permanence lies,’’ wrote a puzzled Edmund Candler, an Englishman, in 1910, ‘‘I think, in her passivity and power to assimilate. The faith that will not fight cannot yield.’’


Since 1945, freedom in the West has been reduced to the right to offend and the freedom to pursue alternative lifestyles. Compared to the exhibitionism of same-sex marriages and the robust show of artistic freedom (including blasphemy and pornography), India’s commitment to democratic freedom may seem less marked. The right to offend is qualified — witness the mounting pile of banned books and the harassment of M F Husain — and there is a tendency to skirt thorny issues such as the Common Civil Code on the grounds that Muslim sensibilities could be hurt.


The spirit of ‘adjustment’ has meant looking the other way when convenient. The triple talaq may appear to violate the ‘‘universality of human rights’’ that Chidambaram referred to in Deoband. But to many Hindus, there is nothing universal about the gender bias in Muslim personal laws; it is a Muslim problem. Except on the touchy issue of cow slaughter, where Hindus are disinclined to look the other way, minority rights in India have been nourished by Hindu self-sufficiency, verging on indifference. Despite attempts by activists and reformers to motivate Hindus into looking beyond personal salvation and the well-being of their family, the ‘live and let live’ principle has sustained Indian democracy and prevented civil strife.


The Hindu ability to be blissfully self-centred has also rested on the absence of provocation. Chidambaram was right to lay the defence of the minority on the doors of the majority but he should have touched on a corresponding concern: Do minorities have obligations too?


Muslim objections to the imagery of Vande Mataram have been around for the past 100 years when the song first captured the nationalist imagination. This was perhaps the main reason why the Constituent Assembly chose Rabindranath Tagore’s ‘Jana gana mana’ as the national anthem and relegated Vande Mataram to the status of a ‘national song’. Since then, it has repeatedly been clarified that it is not obligatory for all Indians to sing Vande Mataram. Yet, while the singing of the first verse of Bankim Chandra’s evocative anthem was deemed to be voluntary, it was understood there would be no disrespect shown to it either. Vande Mataram, after all, became the signature tune of the nationalist movement, not as a calculated disrespect to Muslim feelings; its imagery was located in a different tradition.


At the root of the problem is the spirit of accommodation. By putting its stamp on a fatwa, a religious decree against singing Vande Mataram, the Darul Uloom has violated the mutual show of generosity that is so essential for democracy. It is one thing to deem that singing Vande Mataram is voluntary; it is a separate matter to forbid Muslims from singing the national song. The first is an exercise of choice; the second is an example of doctrinaire intolerance, an act of provocation that will inevitably encourage hotheads to make Vande Mataram a loyalty test of Indian-ness. In 1997, A R Rahman bridged the Vande Mataram divide with his own tribute to Mother India; last week the Deobandis reopened an old wound.


It’s time the worthies in Deoband realised that minority rights can’t be nourished unless accompanied by an equal show of minority wisdom.



The Hanumans say interest on loans is un-Islamic, and so borrowers need not repay, and no further microloans should be given to Muslims.

The government seeks inclusive growth and access to credit. The Sachar Committee is dismayed by the relatively low access of Muslims to bank credit. Yet, neither the government, Sachar Committee members nor intellectuals are raising an outcry against a massive drive to deny millions of Muslim women access to microcredit. This is driven not by Hindu extremists but by Muslim anjumans (community organisations) in Karnataka. Thus, a community complaining of credit deprivation is itself destroying credit to millions of Muslims — because the anjumans are male bastions and the poor borrowers are women.


Ramesh Bellamkonda heads BSS Microfinance, the worst hit of several microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Karnataka. He says BSS has provided microcredit for two years in Kolar, three-and-a-half in Mysore, and eight in Ramanagaram, enjoying excellent relations with its Muslim borrowers and virtually 100% repayment. Today, repayment is down to almost zero, because of non-repayment directives by the anjumans and their goons, who threaten and even assault BSS staff. Muslims constitute a substantial proportion of borrowers, so the anjuman directives can bankrupt entire MFIs, affecting other community borrowers too.
Other Karnataka MFIs in several towns face the same problem, and have been obliged to halt lending to Muslims. It is a triumph for the most reactionary Muslims, and a tragedy for Muslim women denied empowerment through finance.


Some other MFIs say that the problem is not just Islamic. In some areas, including Kolar, so many MFIs have started operations that poor women can get multiple micro-credit loans, and so accumulate big debts that they cannot repay. The economic slowdown after October 2008 also affected repayment capability. However, these explanations for loan default are partial at best, since Hindu and Christian borrowers continue to have a good repayment record.


The anjumans say interest on loans is un-Islamic, and so borrowers need not repay, and no further microloans should be given to Muslims. Really? Then why don’t the anjumans demand that banks stop lending to Muslim businessmen like Azim Premji of Wipro, Khorakiwala of Wockhardt, Hamied of Cipla, film producers and stars like Shah Rukh Khan, and hundreds of Muslim businessmen dominating the leather and footwear industry? Why don’t the anjumans send goons to prevent Muslim millionaires from repaying their much larger loans with interest?


Because the anjumans will not take on moneyed males, only poor women. They don’t like female empowerment through micro-credit, and so use the bogus rhetoric of Islamic finance to promote their gender agenda. Possibly, they also hope that violence can persuade the government to provide a loan waiver, as happened to farm loans.


The gender aspect comes through clearly in one anjuman’s explanation for banning microfinance: it says a female borrower rode pillion on the motor-cycle of a BSS agent. Such male chauvinism is outrageous. In contravention of basic freedoms under the law and Constitution, the anjumans claim the right to control the behaviour of any Muslim woman, and the authority to punish all Muslim female borrowers ignoring their illegal directives.
It matters not at all to the anjumans that the pioneer of microcredit is a Muslim, Mohammed Yunus, who has won the Nobel Peace prize for his work. It matters not that microcredit has made Muslim Bangladesh world famous. Mohammed Yunus has a far better claim to championing poor Muslim women than any anjuman.


It’s worth recalling Yunus’ reaction to the government waiver of farm loans last year. He said that if there was serious distress among farmers, the government should give the distressed farmers enough money to repay their loans. But repayment discipline must be maintained, so that the entire credit system remained healthy and responsible.


This would be a reasonable approach in Karnataka. But none of Yunus’ sentiments matter to the male chauvinists in the anjumans. And, sad to say, politicians do not want to take on anjumans that they view as vote banks. Hence, the Karnataka anjumans have gained credibility, and the non-repayment virus may spread to other states, shutting Muslim women out of the microcredit revolution sweeping India.


The need of the hour is for Muslim leaders and intellectuals to speak out on this issue. Industrialists like Premji, Hamied and Khokariwala must speak out. So should film stars like Shabana Azmi and Shah Rukh Khan. So should Muslim intellectuals from universities, and even vice president Hamid Ansari.


They should expose as bogus the claim of anjumans to be protecting Muslims from MFIs. Rather, the anjumans are depriving Muslim women of the empowerment that Mohammed Yunus pioneered. They are oppressors, not saviours of Muslim women.





Ultimatum to PKR leaders

by Athi Shankar

PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim has issued an ultimatum to party leaders and elected representatives – toe the line or leave the party. Stressing that they should be loyal to the party, the parliamentary opposition leader also pointed out to PKR divisional leaders, assemblypersons and parliamentarians that they should always adhere to party policies.

NONE“A person shall not think that he or she would be leaders and elected representatives forever,” he warned while opening the Penang PKR convention in Komtar Dome, Georgetown last night.

“You must deliver, reach out to the people and adhere to the party’s reform principles and policies. Otherwise, you will be sacked from the party.”

Anwar said that while certain criticisms against the party leaders and elected representatives were acceptable, he would not compromise when it came to those refusing to follow the stipulated party policies. “If you cannot do that, then leave and join UMNO,” he told the PKR crowd.

Anwar said the stance was taken as there were many PKR leaders who wanted stern action taken against errant members. He also gave a stern warning to grassroots leaders who wanted to be division chiefs, parliamentarians, state representatives and councillors – all at the same time.

NONE“If this is the case, go form your own party … then you can hold all the positions,” said Anwar, the Permatang Pauh parliamentarian.

According to Anwar, party leaders and elected representatives should not become arrogant and forget that they were sitting in their current positions because of the people’s support. “The people are the ultimate judges in deciding our political fate. We shall never forget them,” he said.

Pro-BN Hindraf leaders slammed

He also accused certain Indian Malaysian leaders of being Umno stooges in hijacking the spirit of Hindraf, or Hindu Rights Action Force.

NONEPointing out that Makkal Sakti (people’s power) was Pakatan Rakyat’s battle cry in the last general election, he accused these UMNO-sponsored Indian leaders for usurping the “spirit of Hindraf” for their own selfish gains.

“I would like to tell them that I’m a Malay and a Muslim leader who will fight for Indian interests and defend Hindu rights,” he said drawing applause.

Anwar also touched on the PAS national seminar yesterday, saying mk50party president Abdul Hadi Awang had vowed that the Islamist party was fully committed to Pakatan. “Hadi has made it clear that PAS rejects UMNO,” said Anwar.

Saturday, November 7, 2009

A VULTURE NAMED MAHATHIR WITH LINGAM displayed contempt for the rule of law.His frontal assault on the judiciary in 1988 an embarrassment for nation






somewhere in IN MALAYSIA: And the dying old pig said to its young breeder, "You have been kind that I am not slaughtered, like all others of my kin, though I know it was because I was carrying a virusB.N1corrupt practices,. I can see that like me you are infected, but you shall be saved, but what you may innocently pass on to others may have variable consequences."


Snort! And the pig fell silent. A VULTURE NAMED MAHATHIR WITH BEST FRIEND LINGAM they say, nibbled on the carcass for a while, and flu away. It took sometime for the young man to come to terms with the event, he fell ill, but recovered. Prophetically, many other people in the town became sickcorrupt practices, some died.


Absurd.

Horrible.

Ø If you have nothing to hide, why hide and create suspicion.

Ø You hide because you fear that disclosure would do more harm than hiding.

Ø The Evidence Act, 1972 says so.

Ø If you are asked to produced something in your possession and you don't produce it on demand, the presumption is that if produced it would go against your interest.


It appears that the Opposition can win in court, but only in Round One!This is a tragic situation because it gives the impression that judgments are farcical and on the whole totally unacceptable. When people lose their faith in the judiciary, then the courts no longer stand a as a bastion for justice.In Anwar’s case, the High Court in respecting natural justice and recognising the amendment to Section 51A, ordered the prosecution “to allow Anwar’s lawyers to inspect CCTV recordings of the alleged crime scene, along with witness statement of the alleged victim, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan and that of other witnesses as well as doctors’ notes.”


The High Court also ordered the “medical reports on Mohd Saiful from two hospitals – Hospital Kuala Lumpur and Pusrawi Hospital – and other evidence favourable to the defence to be handed over to Anwar.”


This is a very fair judgment considering the fact that this information sought would eventually be made available to the defence during the trial.


If that is the case, and when the amendment to Section 51A allows this, what is the justification in disallowing this vital information to the defence at this stage?


When a person is charged and his freedom is at stake, he deserves to be given every opportunity to prove his innocence.


However, the Court of Appeal had overlooked this very important principle, giving the impression that the court is not concerned with justice and hardly looks at the substantive issues which deserve their critical attention.


Ø I have addressed a few mails to your counterpart Mr. Dhananjay Mahapatra under the heading "HIS MASTERS VOICE". I find that you are echoing the sentiments of Judiciary, as they know that era of their secrecy is over and soon they would be under Public Scrutiny.

Ø When Judge after Judge is found indulging in corrupt practices, amassing wealth, how could we go with your line of reasoning?

Ø There is also blackmailing going on. This particular Judge from Punjab & Haryana High Court who is allegedly being given a clean chit, had threatened that she alone is not involved and if persecuted she would expose all names. Is it not blackmailing?

Ø In my humble opinion, JUDICIARY IS THE CESSPOOL OF CORRUPTION IN THE COUNTRY. IT IS THE FOUNTAINHEAD.

Ø Least educated or qualified people occupy the highest position in judiciary. I am sorry to say that many of Judges do not have basic knowledge of English to read, understand and interpret law.

Ø What we need is a common code of conduct for all public servants, be it bureaucracy, members of legislatures, elected representative, constitutional appointees, and Judges. They must declare their assets every year, criminal record, if any, so on and so forth.

Ø And lastly pardon my saying this, what about Journalists, Newspapers & Electronic Media. You are wise enough to appreciate what I mean. We cannot wait for another sixty years for freedom; it should come to us now, and we would get it.

Ø I have not said anything worse that what you have said for Prashant Bhushan. My views must be published without moderation.


read this exclusive full story story posted by the taxi driver

A VULTURE NAMED MAHATHIR WITH LINGAM displayed contempt for the rule of law.His frontal assault on the judiciary in 1988 an embarrassment for nation


Saturday, October 24, 2009

Stop smear campaign WHEN THE MURDEROUS PRIME MINISTER ORDERED THE 10MILLION DOLLARS MAN THE NUDE ACTER TO JOIN HANDS WHAT IS LEFT EmbattledLiow Tiong

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Stop smear campaign WHEN THE MURDEROUS PRIME MINISTER ORDERED THE 10MILLION DOLLARS MAN THE NUDE ACTER TO JOIN HANDS WHAT IS LEFT EmbattledLiow Tiong

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Stop smear campaign WHEN THE MURDEROUS PRIME MINISTER ORDERED THE 10MILLION DOLLARS MAN THE NUDE ACTER TO JOIN HANDS WHAT IS LEFT EmbattledLiow Tiong


By Adib Zalkapli

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 25 — Embattled MCA deputy president Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai today called on everyone in the party to stop making personal attacks to ensure the success of the peace plan.

"Some quarters still continue with their smear campaign. For the unity plan to work the smear campaign must end," Liow (picture) told a press conference today.

The health minister was referring to an allegation by an MCA central committee member that he was the leader behind the shadowy third force widely credited with instigating the rejection of president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat and his former deputy Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek at the Oct 10 extraordinary general meeting.

In a posting on his blog, Datuk Ti Lian Ker also accused Liow of plotting to take over the party's presidency.

Liow, who was appointed MCA's new No. 2 after the Oct 10 EGM, said the central committee must convene a meeting as soon as possible to work out on the details of the peace plan.

"We agree on the objectives, but for the details we have to go back to the CC," he said.

"The party must quickly sit down, have a meeting as a way for all of us to sort out the details," added Liow.

The plan, brokered by Datuk Seri Najib Razak, calls for Ong to work together with his ousted deputy Dr Chua.

Under the peace plan, Liow would remain deputy president for now pending a response from the ROS on Dr Chua’s application to be recognised as deputy president.


October 25, 2009

WHEN THE MURDEROUS PRIME MINISTER ORDERED THE 10MILLION DOLLARS MAN THE NUDE ACTER TO JOIN HANDS WHAT IS LEFT FOR THE CHINESE COMUNITY IS DING DONG

Filed under: Uncategorized — taxi2driver @ 5:27 am Edit This

The Official Chinese tiger year will start from February 4th 2010 that is the official day of Spring Arrival. 2010 is the year of the golden tiger in accordance of Chinese calendar, but this golden tiger is not shining at all!

To help readers understand I will try to use less jargon to make things simple. We first must understand that everything on earth and beneath the sky, the ancient Chinese would relate or associate with five elements (Wu Xing) such as wood, fire, earth, metal and water.

There are creation and destruction cycles of five elements. Every year, we have two words, one is the Heavenly Stem and the other is the Earthly Branch to represent the year. The Earthly Branches represent the 12 Chinese Zodiacs and is represented by five elements respectively.

The Heavenly Stems are basically Chinese numbers from one to 10 with five elements ascribed to them as well. The Year of the tiger is represented by wood (Earthly Branch) while the Heavenly Stem for the year 2010 is metal. Stem on top (Metal) with the brranch underneath (Wood) would result in metal destroying wood.

Metal destroying wood is a ‘picture’ for the whole year of 2010. Such a picture is not good at all. The increase in road accidents in a big way would alarm the authorities. Abnormal accidents associated with the lymph system, eyes and liver are obvious throughout the year.

Also, a major earthquake would strike the west sector derived from the sound adoption theory of the Stem and Branch (a complicated advanced metaphysical theory in which I will explain in greater length in future). For those who live in the earthquake belt on the West, get the hell out of the place!

The most critical damage for year 2010 is the weather; the weather is causing drought and food shortages around the world especially China, Africa and the USA. Store enough food for your own needs but do not panic, and if you do, that will only benefit the big speculators to take advantage of short-term pitfalls. See below the summary for the 2010 predictions and sad to say, most are bad events.

The weather in the year 2010 is in trouble!

Year 2010 will experience abnormal and unusual changes in weather and could lead to:
1. Drought

.SEE VIDEO ON YOUTUBE HERE

The increasing accidents should be a concern of all.

THE KHINZIR TOYOL ON LOOSE

theSEE VIDEO ON YOUTUBE HERE video is in bad taste. I mean, how can we make fun of Teoh Beng Hock’s death when we should instead be mourning him?related article read thisNAJIB TEOH BENG HOCK was murdered by MACC officers. AS IN ALTANTUYA, The police, MACC, AG and judges are corrupt and partners in crime with UMNO

Returning to Dao ( ) will help you re-organise your thoughts and thus your life destiny. Daoism preaches that one must lead by example and take care of his people. That eludes to a point of filial piety; a value teaching of Confucius and Daoism. As for the economy in particular, the stocks and property markets would be stable, and on the rise, for the first 6 months till August, the second half of the year would see some drastic corrections. Good luck and get back to Dao (the way

READ THE FULL STORY EXCLUSIVE STORY THE TRUE STORY

WHEN THE MURDEROUS PRIME MINISTER ORDERED THE 10MILLION DOLLARS MAN THE NUDE ACTER TO JOIN HANDS WHAT IS LEFT FOER CHINESE COMUNITY IS DING DONG


THE NEW GENERATION OF MALAYSIANS WANT A PEACEFUL INTERPRETATION OF HISTORY – ONE THAT WILL NOT CONTINUE TO BLAME THIS OR THAT GROUP FOR THIS OR THAT ENGINEERED AND WELL-CRAFTED CONFLICTS SEEN AS FACTUAL, OBJECTIVE AND OFFICIAL NARRATIONS OF MALAYSIAN HISTORY.“MAN HAS NO NATURE… WHAT HE HAS IS HISTORY,” WRITES THE SPANISH PHILOSOPHER ORTEGA Y GASSETT.BUT WHOSE HISTORY MUST MAN LEARN? WHOSE CONSTRUCTION OF HISTORY MUST WE CRAFT AS OFFICIAL KNOWLEDGE? WHAT IS THE CONCEPTION OF HUMAN NATURE MUST WE HOLD IN WRITING ABOUT HISTORY? THERE ARE NO HISTORICAL ‘FACTS’. THE TERM ITSELF IS AN OXYMORON AND A CONTRADICTION. THERE ARE ONLY SELECTED MEMORIES WE PURSUE OUT OF OUR IDEOLOGICAL BIASES. UNDERLYING THE SELECTION PROCESS LIE THE ACT OF HISTORICISING AND THE BASE AND SUPERSTRUCTURE THAT SHAPE THE MANNER HISTORY IS WRITTEN. THE MODERN STATE – THE ‘NECESSARY EVIL’- DICTATES THE IDEOLOGY OF HISTORICISING; THUS THE MAXIM “WINNERS WRITE HISTORY, LOSERS WRITE POETRY OR STUDY ANTHROPOLOGY”-THE MUSLIM786 MALAYSIA
YOU MAHATHIR THE ‘NECESSARY EVIL IN HISTORY OF MALAYSIA WHO DESTROYED THE JUDICIARY DO NOT BE MISLED BY MERE CHANGE IN NAME. OUR DEMOCRACY IS MODELLED ALONG BRITISH PARLIAMENTSRY DEMOCRACY BUT WE END UP WITH DICTATORSHIP /TOTAITARIAN SYSTEM OF GUIDED DEMOCRACY AS REPRESENTED BY THE MAHAHIR REGIME AND PEPECTUATED BY THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT. WE TRY TO MODEL OUR ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCY ALONG THE HONGKONG INDEPENDENT CAC BUT MAY END UP WITH A GUIDED COMMISSION THAT MAY NOT BE SO INDEPENDENT.IT CAN BE MODIFIED TO SUIT THE POLTITICAL NEEDS AND DEMANDS AND CONDITIONS OF THE RULING ELITE WITH VESTED INTERESTS. A CHANGE IN NAME WITHOUT A CHANGE IN SUSTANCE IS A


MERE ILLUSION TO HOODWINK THE RAKYAT. IT MAY BE WELL-PLANNED SYSTEM TO PROTECT AND PRESERVE THE HIGHLY CORRUPTED LEGALLY USING OUR OWN GUIDED ‘SYSTEM OF RULE OF LAW’READ THE EXCLUSIVE STOY CLICK THIS part2 YOU MAHATHIR THE ‘NECESSARY EVIL IN HISTORY OF MALAYSIA WHO DESTROYED THE JUDICIARY MERE ILLUSION TO HOODWINK THE RAKYAT.